BuildPulse

Products
Runners
Cheaper per minute, and fewer minutes to pay for
Flaky Tests
Find them, quarantine them, then fix them
Code Coverage
Per branch and per file, from the reporter you already run
Engineering Metrics
Pass rate, build duration and flaky disruption per repo
AI Code Review
A second reviewer on every pull request
Platform API
MCP Server
Blog
Pricing
Sign inStart for free
Pipeline status: bleeding

Your CI is passing failing you in ways you can't see.

Every flaky test failure triggers a re-run. Every re-run burns engineer hours and CI minutes on a problem that isn't a real bug. Most teams have no idea what their flaky rate is, which is exactly why the bill keeps growing. Here's a conservative estimate of what it's costing you.

Why flaky tests are the most expensive hidden cost in CI/CD

Engineering teams running continuous integration pipelines lose thousands of hours per year to flaky tests: tests that pass and fail intermittently without code changes. Each flaky failure triggers a re-run, a context switch, and an investigation into a problem that isn't real. The compound cost across a team is staggering, and most organizations never measure it. Use this calculator to see what flaky tests are costing your team.
flaky-waste.runFAILED · retrying
// your team
30
6
How often does someone hit "re-run" on a red build that wasn't actually their code? Gut feel is fine.
22
Context-switch + waiting for the re-run + checking if it's "really" broken.
// annual flaky-test waste
$280,500
$5,394lost every week you wait
across 30 engineers · 3,432 engineer-hours/year
Engineer time burned$280,500
Re-runs triggered / year9,360
Weeks of one engineer, gone85.8
That re-run habit implies roughly a 24% flaky failure rate. Most teams can't tell you theirs. You can't fix what you can't see.

Most of it is recoverable.

Flaky-test waste isn't a fixed cost of doing business. It's a backlog of unidentified, unquarantined tests. Detecting them, auto-quarantining the worst offenders, and giving owners the data to fix them claws most of it back.

70%
// recoverable / year
$196,350
back in your team's hands, every year

How BuildPulse gets that time back

These are estimates. BuildPulse gives you the real numbers, and the tools to fix them. Here's how it works:

Step 1

Detect

BuildPulse analyzes test results across CI builds to automatically identify flaky tests: no code changes, no annotations, no guesswork.

Connect your CI in 2 minutes. See results on your first build.
Step 2

Quarantine

The worst offenders are auto-quarantined so they stop blocking merges and triggering re-runs. Your pipeline goes green while the tests get fixed.

Re-runs drop as flaky tests stop blocking merges. No more "just re-run it."
Step 3

Fix

Test owners get failure patterns, frequency data, and linked commits: everything they need to resolve the root cause, not just mute the symptom.

Track remediation across your entire suite.
See your actual flaky rate in under 5 minutes. No config files, no SDK: just connect your repo.
Trusted by engineering teams shipping on green
  • Canva
  • Replit
  • Carbon Health
  • Brightline
  • Care Of
  • Homebrew
  • RE/MAX
  • Apify
  • Codecademy
  • Prisma

Stop estimating. Start fixing.

Your team is losing $5,394/week right now.

Start your 14-day free trial and see your real flaky test data on the first build. No charge until day 15.

Start your 14-day free trialTalk to us first →
✓ 14-day free trial✓ No charge for 14 days✓ See results on first build

Not ready to connect your repo? Get the report instead.

We'll send your personalized breakdown: the numbers, the flaky-rate math, and where teams your size recover the most.

No spam. One report, plus the occasional thing worth reading on flaky tests.
How this is calculated

Annual waste = (engineers × re-runs per week × 52) × (minutes lost per failure ÷ 60) × (loaded hourly cost). We assume a loaded engineer cost of $170,000/year ($81.73/hour based on 2,080 working hours), a conservative mid-market figure that includes salary, benefits, and overhead. The implied flaky rate is derived from re-run frequency against a typical CI run volume. It's an estimate, not a measurement, which is the point: real numbers require actually instrumenting your test suite. Defaults are deliberately conservative; most teams that measure find it's worse.

Frequently asked questions about CI waste and flaky tests

The cost varies widely depending on team size, re-run frequency, and loaded engineer cost. The calculator above estimates it from your own inputs. Most teams are surprised by how high the number is once they quantify it.
A flaky test is a test that passes and fails intermittently without any code changes. Common causes include race conditions, shared mutable state, time-dependent logic, and external service dependencies. Flaky tests trigger unnecessary CI re-runs, waste engineer time investigating false failures, and erode confidence in the entire test suite.
Commonly cited ranges vary, and most teams never measure their own flaky rate, which is the core problem. Without instrumentation, flaky tests accumulate silently and the cumulative cost goes untracked. The implied rate shown in the calculator above is derived from your re-run frequency, not from an industry benchmark.
The most effective approach is: (1) automated flaky test detection using cross-build analysis, (2) quarantining the worst offenders so they stop blocking merges, and (3) providing test owners with data on failure patterns to fix root causes. BuildPulse automates all three steps: detecting flaky tests across CI runs, auto-quarantining them, and tracking remediation.
Your team is losing $5,394/week· 180 wasted re-runs/week
Start free trialTalk to us